The Inside Story: Why a Ron Paul Disciple Left His Ranks by Gregory Hilton

David Bahnsen of Newport Beach, California is a Senior Vice President of Morgan Stanley, and also serves on the Board of Advisors of the California Recovery Project with Dr. Arthur Laffer. Bahnsen has abandoned his earlier support of the Ron Paul crusade, and now describes himself as an “economically literate Republican.” He wrote the recent article “The Undiscerning and Dangerous Appreciation of Ron Paul.”
The author says “It is the ironic that Ron Paul’s alleged praiseworthiness comes from his devotion to the Constitution, when in fact, he has emphatically rejected it.” Bahnsen has many family and business connections with libertarians. His late father, Dr. Greg Bahnsen, was one of the top three leaders of the Christian Reconstructionism movement which calls on the religious community to put their faith into action.
The primary target in his article is Lew Rockwell, who has been the Congressman’s most prominent ghost writer for the past 30 years. Rockwell served four years as the Congressman’s chief of staff and has been vice chairman of his presidential campaigns.
Rockwell publishes Ron Paul’s books, and Bahnsen says Rockwell and Paul are “one and the same.” Rockwell is also Chairman of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute which is closely associated with Paul and advocates the Austrian School of Economics. The libertarians believe in the Austrian School which is totally ignored with good reason by mainstream academia.
The standard economics texts used on the university level do not even mention it. There are no more than 75 scholars worldwide who follow the Austrian School while there are over 20,000 economists in the American Economics Association.
Mainstream economists use the scientific method, but the Austrians reject it. Mainstream economists make heavy use of statistics, but the Austrians claim they have little value. Mainstream economists believe in fiat money, while the Austrians believe in the gold standard. Libertarian economics is a small cult. Bahnsen, 37, is still “heavily influenced” by libertarian economics, and has many interesting observations about their inside world. Some excerpts from Bahnsen’s article are as follows:

  • I attended every Ludwig Von Mises Institute conference I could find, and read all the books their movement published. Ron Paul spoke at every one of these events. When I wasn’t listening to John Denton say America had no business getting into World War II, or former Rep. Bob Barr (R-GA) saying the federal government (not Tim McVeigh) blew up the building in Oklahoma City, I was intrigued by much of what their movement had to say.
  • As I got older and wiser, I began to realize the heir of Friedrich Hayek was Milton Friedman, not libertarian Murray Rothbard. I realized this ‘Austrian economics movement’ was a front for an extremist form of anti-war zealotry. Every conference break was filled with the most radical of conspiracy theorists you have ever heard, and the political intentions of the major brains behind their operation were not hidden: utter anarchy.
  • On Rockwell’s website you will hear that Winston Churchill was a worse war criminal than Joseph Stalin or Adolf Hitler. You will see a celebration that Tony Snow died of cancer (because he did, after all, support the Iraq war). You will find out that Lew Rockwell believes the Constitution is a statist document.
  • You will read that the men and women serving our military are despicable little immoral creatures, trained to kill innocent parties. The Winston Churchill statue at Hillsdale College is called a travesty. Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, Ronald Reagan and George Bush are all called warmongers.
  • I spent several hours speaking with Ron Paul shortly after 9/11. He informed me that the Islamist threat was a made up one, just as the Communist threat of the 1950’s and 1960’s was. He told me, to my face, in his own words, that Lew Rockwell and his people were the only ones calling a spade a spade: America did deserve what the Islamists were trying to do to us, and if we simply learned to leave them alone, they would in turn leave us alone.
  • Ron Paul’s role in advancing the cause of limited government and a monetary policy of common sense is, shall we say, minimal. He uses every opportunity when in front of a microphone to advance the cause of military isolationism.

You can read Bahnsen’s original article at:

2 responses to “The Inside Story: Why a Ron Paul Disciple Left His Ranks by Gregory Hilton

  1. This guy as far as I know was never involved in any part of the Campaign or with Dr. Paul at all and even states that in the first few lines of his article. and I was in charge of the Los Angeles County Campaign I will double check my records but I can say right now he was never worked with any of us.

    I have seen many twisted things in my life but lets say I would not know where to start with many of the out right lies you create.

    to each his own.

  2. Personally I find it difficult to reconcile Mr. Bahsen’s professed adherence to Christian Reconstructionism with his support of Lincoln, FDR and George H.W. Bush and his position as a Senior Vice President with Morgan Stanley. This is surely a classic case of doublethink.

    According to Wikipedia: Christian Reconstructionism embraces:

    “Decentralised political order resulting in laissez-faire capitalism and minimal state power, but only with respect to economics.”

    To my certain knowledge Lincoln instigated a war that cost 600,000 lives in order to centralise power. FDR with the interests of the banking community clearly in view set America well on the road to a centralised socialist state. George H.W. Bush is on record as being in favour of and seeking to bring into existence the New World Order, a technocratic monolithic world government with all the power in the hands of a few.

    Add to this the fact that Morgan Stanley is in the very thick of the central banking network that has thrown the world into financial crisis through its monetary manipulations and we can see that Mr. Bahsen is indeed a practitioner of

    Doublethink (coined by George Orwell in his novel 1984):
    “The acceptance of two contradictory ideas or beliefs at the same time.”

    Given this simple self evident observation it is clear that nothing Mr. Bahsen has to say about Ron Paul’s thought processes, his associates or his beliefs can be taken seriously since we cannot tell out of which side of his mind he is speaking. Mr. Bahsen is a man of divided loyalties or as we say in Christian parlance he is double minded.

    “…for the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea, blown and tossed around by the wind. For that person must not suppose that he will receive anything from the Lord, since he is a double-minded individual, unstable in all his ways.” (James 1:6b-8)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s